Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for July 8th, 2010

This is higher education? The Dance Draw program at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte received $750,000 of stimulus dollars and created 1.5 jobs. 

The project is called ‘Dance Draw.

Sounds like something that would be offered at a liberal education college. What does it entail?

UNCC dance students wear wireless computer mice on their chests and wrists to “draw” abstract geometric shapes on a computer screen.

Dance Draw won more than $750,000 in federal stimulus money.

Are you fucking kidding me? $750,000 to teach liberals to wear wireless mice and draw? The dumbing down of America continues.

Dance Draw drew fire because of the number of jobs it reportedly created, one and a half.

One and a half jobs at $750,000. That sounds like Obama numbers.

Only a progressive government could give away $750,000 in tax dollars for a class like this. Your tax dollars at work America. The great news is you are paying for future Democrats to learn how to draw and dance.

Read Full Post »

Damn, she got Baghdad Bob Gibbs with that question. We should point that out to every lefty who is whining about the Arizona immigration law. Why isn’t Obama suing sanctuary cities like San Francisco for violating federal immigration laws? Arizona is being sued for wanting to enforce immigration laws.

Typical Gibbs response is to sound like Obama…ahhh…ohhh…umm stutter…stammer..duck the question to ask the one in control for the answer. Democrats do not want to enforce federal immigration laws for a reason. More criminals on their voter rolls keeps them in power.

Read Full Post »

Automated Taxpayer Machine

Only Democrats could think of this sort of tax hike. To pay down their record spending spree, that added trillions to the deficit, Democrats are pushing a bill that will help them pay down the deficits they’re creating. Let’s tax Americans on their ATM withdrawals.

One idea for raising taxes to pay down the debt is the bill introduced this February by Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-Pa.). His “Debt Free America Act” (H.R. 4646) would impose a 1 percent “transaction tax” on every financial transaction — whether paid by cash, credit card or any form of financial transfer, the only exception being transactions involving the purchase or sale of stock. Theoretically, everyone would pay one cent on the dollar for every such transaction in America every day — whether $3 million on a $300 million business acquisition, $300 on the purchase of a $30,000 car, or $5 on a $500 ATM withdrawal.

To reduce the impact of such a flat tax on the poor, Fattah’s bill provides for a 1 percent tax credit for couples earning $250,000 or less ($125,000 or less for individuals) and discretion by the Treasury Department to exempt certain transactions on which lower-income people disproportionately rely. Another idea would be to amend his bill to exempt all transactions below $500.

Great idea. Let’s steal their money and then offer it back to them in the form of a tax credit. This will fool the weak-minded followers who think “free money…great” but it is just another Democrat pushing a scheme to steal money from taxpayers. If passed, this bill will only create another slush fund for politicians to raid.

The taxpayers are truly the government’s ATM! AUTOMATED TAXPAYER MACHINE

Read Full Post »

Here they go again. The Federal Reserve is thinking about injecting massive amounts of your money into the economy to keep it going…again!

Federal Reserve officials, increasingly concerned over signs the economic recovery is faltering, are considering new steps to bolster growth.

With Congress tied in political knots over whether to take further action to boost the economy, Fed leaders are weighing modest steps that could offer more support for economic activity at a time when their target for short-term interest rates is already near zero. They are still resistant to calls to pull out their big guns — massive infusions of cash, such as those undertaken during the depths of the financial crisis — but would reconsider if conditions worsen.

Top Fed officials still say that the economic recovery is likely to continue into next year and that the policy moves being discussed are not imminent. But weak economic reports, the debt crisis in Europe and faltering financial markets have led them to conclude that the risks of the recovery losing steam have increased. After months of focusing on how to exit from extreme efforts to support the economy, they are looking at tools that might strengthen growth.

Yes, more money from the struggling taxpayers to bailout the government and the economy they’re destroying. How did all those bailouts help the taxpayers or main street? Open your wallets, the politicians are going to ask for more handouts.

Read Full Post »

Let's give away things...that will save the taxpayers millions

America…taxpayers…we are screwed. Obama is holding another contest that basically asks Federal employees “how can I save money.” I have a quick answer. Stop hiring federal employees who earn more than their bosses (taxpayers). Simple solution.

The Washington Post reports:

Federal workers with thoughts on how to save taxpayer dollars can start submitting their cost-conscious ideas Thursday as part of a contest backed by the White House.

The second annual SAVE Award will start accepting submissions at http://www.saveaward.gov from Thursday through July 22. Federal employees will be able to rank the submissions submitted by colleagues, and the general public will be able to vote on the top submissions later in the year. The contest winner earns a meeting with President Obama, who will include the winning idea in his fiscal 2012 budget proposal.

Fiscal 2012 budget? Hell, Congress didn’t pass a budget in 2010 for 2011. A historic first, which happened under the most open, most honest, most ethical Democratically controlled Congress.

Want to hear the brilliant idea that won last year?

Last year’s winning idea came from Nancy Fichtner, a Department of Veterans Affairs employee from Colorado who suggested that VA medical centers should permit patients to take home extra bandages and medication when they are discharged. The change in policy is expected to save the Department of Veterans Affairs at least $14.5 million by 2014, the OMB said.

Givng away items that have already been paid for? This saves money? The taxpayers paid for these  “extra” bandages and medication. The Obama administration wants you to believe that giving away items saves money. Are they fucking serious? Try this with your business and see how long you stay in business.

We’re screwed America. This is the most inept administration in history. They seem perfectly able to spend our money but are true idiots when it comes to saving our money. This is what you get when you elect someone with no business or executive experience. Remember this the next time you vote.

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

 

The reason for the lawsuit

The Obama administration is suing Arizona, but Rhode Island has already been enforcing federal immigration law by an executive order from the governor since 2008. Rhode Island law enforcement has done what Arizona wants its law enforcement officers to do…stop illegal immigration. Rhode Island’s law has been in effect since 2008.

Hey Obama…you gonna get Eric Holder to sue Rhode Island?

The Boston Globe reports (H/T to HotAir.com):

Rhode Island State Trooper Nuno Vasconcelos was patrolling Interstate 95 a few months ago when he came upon a two-car accident in heavy traffic. The trooper pulled up, stepped out of his cruiser, and asked one of the drivers for his license.

The man said he did not have a license, and under questioning, confessed that he was here illegally from Guatemala.

If the accident had happened 15 miles north in Massachusetts, the man would probably have been arrested for driving without a license, which carries a fine of up to $1,000 and 10 days in jail, then released pending an appearance in district court.

But in Rhode Island, illegal immigrants face a far greater penalty: deportation.

“There are police chiefs throughout New England who hide from the issue . . . and I’m not hiding from it,’’ said Colonel Brendan P. Doherty, the towering commander of the Rhode Island State Police. “I would feel that I’m derelict in my duties to look the other way.’’

This is what Obama is doing…looking the other way to gather the Hispanic vote.

From Woonsocket to Westerly, the troopers patrolling the nation’s smallest state are reporting all illegal immigrants they encounter, even on routine stops such as speeding, to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, known as ICE.

Rhode Island’s collaboration with federal immigration authorities is controversial; critics say the practice increases racial profiling and makes immigrants afraid to help police solve crimes.

Want to know the irony of the Obama administration suing Arizona? Nowhere in the suit is racial discrimination or profiling mentioned. Basically the Department of Justice is suing Arizona for wanting to do what Rhode Island has been doing since 2008.

Yes, Obama wants to sue a state for wanting to enforce laws that protect Americans. On the other hand, Demcrats want to ease these immigration laws to help the criminals sneaking across the border. This adds up to 12 million plus undocumented Democrats committing crimes and voting in elections. A win-win for Obama and the Democrats.

Will Rhode Island face the same scrutiny Obama put on Arizona? The states of Oklahoma, South Carolina and Utah are about to pass immigration laws similiar to those of Rhode Island and Arizona. Will Obama sue these states as well?

Maybe Obama should concentrate on the economy, reducing unemployment and plugging the damn hole in the oil well instead of concentrating on states who want to enforce laws that his administration refuses to enforce. Claiming the Arizona law ‘unsurps’ federal authority wouldn’t be an issue if the federal authorites were doing their job.

Obama, do you damn job!

Read Full Post »

If he's breathing...he's lying

Just another day and another Obama lie exposed. ABC News’ Jake Tapper has been using fact-checking to get down to the real truth on political debate. Tapper fact checks discovered the Obama administration’s claims that the Senate was holding up the nomination of Dr. Donald Berwick and found: “Republicans were not delaying or stalling Berwick’s nomination. Indeed, they were eager for his hearing.”

Jake Tapper reports, via Political Punch:

In announcing the recess appointment of Dr. Donald Berwick to head the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services – and two other nominees — today President Obama said in a statement that “It’s unfortunate that at a time when our nation is facing enormous challenges, many in Congress have decided to delay critical nominations for political purposes.”

That claim is reasonably true for the other two nominees given recess appointments today.

Republicans long objected to the nomination of Philip Coyle, now the associate director for National Security and International Affairs at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, because of Coyle’s opposition to missile defense.

The nomination of Joshua Gotbaum, now the director of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, had also been held up.

Unmentioned by the president: the senator who had put a hold on Gotbaum’s nomination was Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, who put a hold on Gotbaum’s nomination in May because of the way Gotbaum’s former employer Delphi Corp. dealt with pensioned former employees.

But it’s not the case with Berwick, whose recess appointment is getting most of the attention.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., echoed the president’s suggestion, saying that “Republican lockstep stalling of Don’s nomination was a case study in cynicism and one awful example of how not to govern.”

But Republicans were not delaying or stalling Berwick’s nomination.

Indeed, they were eager for his hearing, hoping to assail Berwick’s past statements about health care rationing and his praise for the British health care system.

“The nomination hasn’t been held up by Republicans in Congress and to say otherwise is misleading,” said Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, which would have held Berwick’s hearing.

Grassley said that he “requested that a hearing take place two weeks ago, before this recess.”

Berwick’s nomination was sent to the Senate in April, and his hearing had not been scheduled because he was participating in the “standard vetting process,” a Democratic aide on the Senate Finance Committee told ABC News.

But speaking not for attribution, Democratic officials say that neither Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., nor Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the chair of the Senate Finance Committee, were eager for an ugly confirmation fight four months before the midterm elections

There it is. Obama lied and blamed Republicans for delaying his appointment of another radical who favors health care rationing. It was the Democrats who were scared to hold these hearings before the November midterm elections. This is the same reason they ‘deemed and passed’ a $1.12 trillion dollar fake budget. Fear of the upcoming midterm elections.

Tapper makes a great point near the end of his report…

Does using the Constitutional recess appointment prerogative so as to avoid having to expend political energy and capital on a fight one doesn’t want to wage – does that live up to the president’s stated promise of transparency?

Obama’s transparency is well known and it is well known that much of what comes across his gums and out of his mouth are pure lies.

Read Full Post »

Unrequited Affections Leave One Lonely

The One and Only Snidely Whiplash

Government is like the lover that never returns to you an equal amount you gave to her. Oh, she talks pretty, like you’re the only one, but where is she when ya need a hug? Or a fondle for that matter? Hell, at this point, after all we’ve put into her we could at least hope for a reach around, but alas, it is not to be.

Putting one’s faith in this lover is a wasted journey. She’ll promise ya the moon and deliver ya rocks. She’ll preach it’s all about you, her one and only concern, and then ya turn your back and there she is chatting up some other country and selling your interests down the river. She has the loyalty of the habitual liar.

Nothing she says seems to be true. She builds ya up and assures you she can be trusted; that your faith put in her is well placed, yet the next thing ya know there she is at the UN forgetting her oath to you and you alone and now she’s promising the Moon to someone from Upper Armpit.

How many times will we be lied to by our unfaithful partner? How many unrequited sweet nothings will she demand, all the while our hearts are breaking? When one is loved – I mean really loved – the one who loves you is supposed to have your and only your best interests at heart. When someone loves you they are supposed to care more for your happiness than their own. Clearly this flouncy strumpet does not care for us as much as she swears she does.

Those of us who love her are in a constant state of disappointment. What will she be tomorrow? What new demand will be placed upon us in order we show her we love her? What lie will she try and convince us is truth? What usurpation in her heart will we next suffer? Hey, I thought I was number one, your one and only?

Didn’t ya beg me to trust ya? Didn’t ya assure me everything ya do is with my best interest at heart? Yet you act entirely different then when ya begged me to give ya another chance. Despite my best interests ya sold me out. It seems my lover has some grand scheme and does not see fit to clue me in on it.

To continue reading Snidely’s article, please visit his homepage here.

Read Full Post »

This is truly bad news for Obama, his beloved unions and all those federal jobs he’s created.

Rasmussen Reports Poll:

Most Americans would not pay higher taxes for specific public services in their states, but they are more supportive of paying for education and staffing law enforcement than supporting state employees and entitlement programs.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Adults shows that only 19% would be willing to pay higher taxes to avoid layoffs of state employees. Sixty-nine percent (69%) say they would not be willing to pay more in taxes for this reason. Another 11% are undecided.

Adults feel similarly when it comes to funding entitlement programs. Twenty-two percent (22%) would pay higher taxes to prevent cuts in entitlement programs for low-income Americans. Sixty-three percent (63%) say they would not pay more to keep these programs afloat. Another 15% are undecided.

Americans are slightly less opposed to paying higher taxes for education. Thirty-four percent (34%) say they are willing to pay higher taxes to provide funding for public education, but 54% say they are not. Another 12% aren’t sure.

Thirty-seven percent (37%) say they are willing to pay higher taxes to increase the number of police and firemen in their communities. Still, 52% say they would not be willing to do so. Another 10% are not sure.

These results are less surprising when you consider consistent polling shows that Likely Voters nationwide prefer a government that provides fewer services but imposes lower taxes to one with more services and higher taxes.

Most U.S. voters (52%) continue to believe that tax increases will hurt the economy, while just 22% think tax increases are good for the economy

Please pass this information along to Obama and other progressive parasites who believe the taxpayers should pay for their entitlements and bail them out. The union bailouts are coming. Just you wait and see.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 486 other followers

%d bloggers like this: