Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for November 15th, 2010

In a world where freedom is held captive and liberty is a slave to corporations. Michael Shaw refuses to be roped into the controlled chaos of the new world order. In this exclusive interview with Michael Shaw he talks about Agenda 21 and details how he believes the government could implement a police state. He also speaks about the United States currently standing on the brink of a population downsizing and ways that the government could be manipulating the masses through controlled chaos.

Read Full Post »

Commit a crime in Philadelphia. Escape judgment and paying for your crime. Then wait until the court system to forgives you. This is what 19,400 fugitives were rewarded.

Philly.com reports:

Twenty-three years later, the woman still trembles when she remembers the attack.

The man pushed his way into her Kensington house at gunpoint, slapped her so hard her glasses shattered, then forced her to have oral sex.

The alleged attacker, Francisco Sanchez, fled before trial, but the woman says she never gave up hope that one day he would be tried and convicted.

“I wished all my life that they would catch him,” she said in a recent interview. “I would go to court to testify and do as much as possible to send the man to jail.”

But in a sweeping move to lower Philadelphia’s staggering tally of 47,000 fugitives, top court officials have quietly dropped criminal charges against Sanchez and more than 19,000 other defendants who skipped court years ago.

At the urging of Pennsylvania Chief Justice Ronald D. Castille and District Attorney Seth Williams, Philadelphia judges closed criminal cases and canceled fugitive bench warrants for thousands of accused drug dealers, drunken drivers, thieves, prostitutes, sex offenders, burglars, and other suspects.

The withdrawn cases date to 1998 and earlier.

“They were clogging up the system,” said Castille, a former Philadelphia district attorney. “You’re never going to find these people. And if you do, are you going to prosecute them? The answer is no.”

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

How in the hell do you ‘redouble’ socialism?

ABCNews.com reports:

En route back to Washington after a 10-day trip overseas, President Obama was introspective about his first two years in office.  The president told reporters aboard Air Force One that he had an “obsessive focus” on policy and he will now “redouble” efforts to get back to his core principles. 

Obama said he “neglected” things that matter a lot to Americans in his rush to get major legislation passed. He explained those things as maintaining a bipartisan tone, dealing with earmarks, making sure that policy decisions are fully debated and shaping public opinion.  He can better focus on these principals now, the president explained, because the economy is more stable. 

The president plans to meet with Congressional leadership this week and said he expects that even though his party lost badly in the midterm election, Republicans will work with him to get things done.

“I am very confident that the American people were not issuing a mandate for gridlock,” Obama said. “They want to see us make progress.”  

Obama repeated his belief that the country can’t afford to extend the Bush tax cuts for people earning more than $250,000 a year. 

“I believe it is a mistake for us to borrow $700 billion to make tax cuts permanent for millionaires and billionaires,” he said.

Obama has no problem with borrowing $3 trillion dollars to reward the other 98%, of which 47% pay no federal taxes but still receives tax refunds.
Obama believes he has the power to redistribute the wealth of others.

Read Full Post »

Notice Ms. Huffington doesn’t answer the question about where in the Constitution or why she switched from Conservative to Liberal? Huffington was never a Conservative. She was part of the Progressive movement that invaded the Conservative movement.

Why do Democrats listen to folks with European accents? Remember, Huffington Post is the liberal rag Obama wants you to read. Huffington and George Soros are tied together and all link back to Obama.

Read Full Post »

Why does anyone listen to, or read, anything Paul Krugman says? Well the big mouth went and stuck his foot in his mouth when discussing ways to reduce the deficit. Mr. Keynesian Economics says the deficit can be reduced by the use of ‘death panels’ in ObamaCare and the value-added-tax (VAT).

You see, ObamaCare is based on the government-run, socialized healthcare that Europeans hate. The reason its hated is because of the death panels which decides what areas of health care should be rationed to save money.

The value added tax, VAT, is another European idea the Obama administration is contemplating. The VAT tax is a sneaky tax that is added to the cost of items, from production all the way to distribution. In other words, its several taxes combined before the product is sold to the taxpayer. In other words, it makes everything more expensive.

Now that Krugman admits that ObamaCare has its death panels, he is walking back his own words.

NewsMax.com reports:

Economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman says the only way the U.S. will get its debt crisis under control is by the use of “death panels” and a national sales tax.

The national sales tax, referred to as VAT (value-added tax) and widely used by governments across Europe, will help cut the U.S deficit, Krugman argues.

Krugman made his comments on ABC’s “This Week with Christiane Amanpour” during a roundtable discussion about the economy and the recent findings of the U.S. Debt Reduction Commission.

Here’s the key excerpt:

“Some years down the pike, we’re going to get the real solution, which is going to be a combination of death panels and sales taxes. It’s going to be that we’re actually going to take Medicare under control, and we’re going to have to get some additional revenue, probably from a VAT. But it’s not going to happen now.”

The Obama healthcare plan passed by Congress in 2010 includes government-run healthcare committees with sweeping powers, including the power to engage in competitive pricing and cost analysis, a system used by Britain that has led to rationing of medical care for the elderly.

Critics of the Obama plan, including former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, quickly dubbed the committees “death panels,” saying government agencies would decide who would live and who would die. Supporters of the Obama health plan dismissed such suggestions as nonsense.

Krugman apparently thinks otherwise, and suggests that such death panels could be one way the federal government will be able to deal with soaring medical costs under control as the Baby Boomers enter retirement.

He continued: “If they [the Debt Commission] were going to do reality therapy, they should have said, ‘OK, look, Medicare is going to have to decide what it’s going to pay for. And at least for starters, it’s going to have to decide which medical procedures are not effective at all and should not be paid for at all. In other words, it should have endorsed the panel that was part of the healthcare reform.’”

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

If you think I'm guilty...you're just raaaacist!

Finally! Corrupt Democrat Charlie Rangel will stand trial for his ethics violations.

From the Washington Post:

With no lawyers expected at his side, Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) is scheduled to begin his defense Monday against allegations that he broke congressional rules in his personal finances and his fundraising efforts for a New York college.

This will be Rangel’s excuse when he is found guilty. That and race.

The public trial, conducted by an eight-member panel of Rangel’s congressional peers, will be the first of its kind since 2002. It will be all the more remarkable for Rangel because he no longer has a defense team.

After spending more than $2 million from his campaign account on lawyers and communications experts, Rangel and his team parted ways in September. They had repeatedly clashed over his approach to the defense, including his impromptu decision to deliver a more than 30-minute speech on the House floor in mid-August.

“I am not going away,” Rangel, 80, said during that speech, imploring the ethics committee to hold the trial immediately so he could have his case heard before the midterm elections. “Don’t leave me swinging in the wind until November.”

Now, after winning his 21st term two weeks ago, the former assistant U.S. attorney will get his first dose of something resembling a courtroom since the mid-1960s. Expected to last about a week, Rangel’s trial is to be followed two weeks later by a trial of Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.). She is accused of improperly using her office’s influence in helping get federal bailout support for a bank in which her husband was a large investor.

Yes, the idiots in New York elected the crook who writes tax laws but believes he is above those laws. Taxes are for the little people.

The logistics of the cases are somewhat unclear because the ethics committee tends to operate in deep levels of secrecy. The prosecution will be represented by staff lawyers for the committee who handled the two-year investigation of Rangel; the congressman is expected to deliver an opening statement that would likely mirror much of his August floor speech.

It is unclear whether witnesses will be on hand or if committee lawyers will just read transcripts, and, if witnesses are present, whether Rangel will cross-examine them under oath.

Rangel’s office declined to comment for this story. The lawmaker has acknowledged that he broke some rules, but he said that he did so unknowingly and that his mistakes involved no acts of corruption related to legislation.

Poor Charlie ‘forgot’ to pay the taxes on his Dominican villa. He ‘forgot’ the secret bank accounts that held almost $1 million dollars. All simple mistakes.

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 486 other followers

%d bloggers like this: