Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for December 13th, 2010

Whoever is in charge of that teleprompter should be fired for making Obama say stupid things.

Politico reports:

President Obama thanked a host of Democrats and Republicans on Monday for helping to pass a childhood nutrition bill — including the Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell.

Obama goofed up on McConnell’s name, though, calling him “Mike” and moving on without correcting himself.

Oops. That was Obama off his teleprompter. See what happens when Obama doesn’t have his words feed to him via teleprompter. I often wonder if he can think for himself without reading it from a screen.

Read Full Post »

Hey President...the economy is sinking and people want jobs. Obama: Let me finish another game of basketball and I'll be right on it

On Friday, Obama skipped out on his press conference and left the Presidential duties to ex-President Bill Clinton. Today Obama got back to doing presidential duties…by playing basketball.

From the L.A. Times:

It’s becoming an annual tradition.

The Lakers win a championship. The Lakers have a victory parade. The Lakers visit President Obama the next season when they cruise through Washington.

They met him at the White House last season and they are scheduled to see Obama again Monday at a Boys & Girls Club in the city, where they will be conducting a clinic with elementary-school children and perhaps playing some light one-on-one with the president.

Parties, golf and basketball. The hard life of a baller-in-chief.

Read Full Post »

Listen carefully to the phrase change…

This is what Progressives Liberals Progressive Socialist do. Remember this exchange between President Obama and George Stephanopoulos where Obama claims the individual mandate IS NOT A TAX?

But now that the Obama administration is arguing the constitutionality of his health care takeover, they’re saying it is a TAX. Constantly changing their words to takeover another industry.

The bill was passed with lies, bribes and outright fraud. Need more proof?

Read Full Post »

We continuously hear Democrats make the fraudulent claim that tax cuts add to the deficit. We are hearing this same claim right now over the extension of the Bush TAX RATES from 2001 & 2003. Americans need to understand that these extensions are not tax cuts. If the Democrats block this extension, EVERYONE’S taxes increase. Republicans are fighting to keep the tax rates the same.

Spending increases the deficit.

John Hayward reports, via Human Events:

One of the amusing things about watching the Left go to war against itself is the angry chaos as they settle on which fairy tales to believe.  A Democrat Party that used to become purple with rage over being called “socialist” just embraced openly-declared socialist Bernie Sanders of Vermont as its new spokesman and folk hero, after he delivered a filibuster against the tax deal that dragged on for longer than the theatrical release of The Lord of the Rings trilogy… and I’m talking about the whole trilogy, not just Return of the King, although the director’s cut of the Sanders speech will restore the scene where the Witch King appears on the House floor and breaks his staff.

On the same evening, Barack Obama effectively resigned the Presidency, turning it over to noted “Third Way” triangulator Bill Clinton, who assured Democrats that the agreement between his predecessor and congressional Republicans was a “good bill” that will “really help America over the long term.”  It is impossible for any Democrat to hold a consistent set of beliefs and agree with both Sanders and Acting President Clinton.

Of course, the key insight to Democrat Party economics is that it begins with three truly immutable core beliefs: (1) successful people who are not loyal Party members are evil and must be punished; (2) government spending is both morally and practically superior to free choice; and (3) “progress” means perpetual growth in the size of government.  Everything else a given Democrat believes is reasoned backward from these foregone conclusions.  They stop being Democrats at the precise moment this is no longer true.  I thought it might be useful to review a few of the lies being told about the Clinton tax deal with the Republicans, in the hopes it might prompt a few more people to stop being Democrats – which, to quote the Acting President, “would really help America over the long term.”

First and most importantly, you can dispense with the sanctimonious balloon juice that Democrat politicians care about the federal deficit.  Senate Democrats obviously don’t, since they insisted on larding the Clinton tax compromise with all sorts of targeted tax breaks for favored constituencies, after weeks of bleating that refusing to raise taxes was “irresponsible” because it would increase the deficit.  No one who paid the slightest attention to the actions of Democrats since they took control of Congress in 2006 would believe they view deficit reduction as a priority, but here’s a fresh reminder.  The deficit is only meaningful to the Left when they can use it as a club to beat down resistance to tax increases. 

This leads to the important myth about tax reduction causing deficits.  No belief is more crucial to the Democrat voter.  It’s a lie, and giving it up is like unplugging themselves from the Matrix.  There have been four major tax reductions since the implementation of the income tax, and every one of them has been followed by increased tax revenue.  Yes, that includes the unspeakable Bush tax cuts, as reported in such right-wing propaganda rags as… The New York Times.

In a July 2006 piece, Edmund Andrews of the Times writes, “An unexpectedly steep rise in tax revenues from corporations and the wealthy is driving down the projected budget deficit this year, even though spending has climbed sharply because of the war in Iraq and the cost of hurricane relief.”  Tax receipts after the Bush cuts were about $250 billion over the previous year’s levels.

Revenue increase after tax relief is strongly influenced by who gets the tax relief.  Here’s where the 2006 revenue surge came from, according to the New York Times: “Corporate tax payments are expected to exceed $300 billion, up from $131 billion three years ago.  The other big increase is an extraordinary jump in individual taxes that were not withheld from paychecks, usually a reflection of taxes on investment income and executive bonuses.”  That’s right, kids – corporations, investors, and executives.  In other words, The Evil Rich.

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

It’s unconstitutional and a takeover of our health care system. The worst piece of legislation in U.S. history.

Rasmussen Reports:

Time doesn’t seem to be winning the new national health care law any more friends. Most voters have favored repeal of the law every week since it was passed and support for repeal has now inched up to its highest level since mid-September. Many Americans remain concerned that the law will force them to change their health insurance coverage.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 60% of Likely U.S. Voters at least somewhat favor repeal of the health care law while 34% are opposed. As has been the case since the law was first passed, those who favor repeal feel more passionately than those who want to keep the law–46% Strongly Favor repeal while just 23% who are Strongly Opposed. (To see survey question wording, click here.) 

Total support for repeal is up four points from a week ago but consistent with opposition to the law for months. Support for repeal has ranged from 50% to 63% in weekly tracking since Democrats in Congress passed the law in late March.

Voters remain almost even divided over whether the law will mean they have to change their existing health insurance coverage. Forty-four percent (44%) think it is at least somewhat likely they will have to change their health insurance, including 20% who say it is Very Likely. Nearly as many (42%) believe they are unlikely to have to change their coverage, with 15% who say it is Not Likely At All. Thirteen percent (13%) are not sure.

Read Full Post »

We decide what you can and cannot eat~Food Nazi Michelle Obama

The Food Nazi is at it again. Michelle Obama believes she should regulate what your children eat because she’s just smarter than us.

(CNSNews.com) — Speaking at Monday’s signing ceremony for the “Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act”– a law that will subsidize and regulate what children eat before school, at lunch, after school, and during summer vacations in federally funded school-based feeding programs — First Lady Michelle Obama said of deciding what American children should eat: “We can’t just leave it up to the parents.”

“Everywhere I go, fortunately, I meet parents who are working very hard to make sure that their kids are healthy,” said Mrs. Obama. “They’re doing things like cutting down on desserts and trying to increase fruits and vegetables. They’re trying to teach their kids the kind of healthy habits that will stay with them for a lifetime.

“But when our kids spend so much of their time each day in school, and when many children get up to half their daily calories from school meals, it’s clear that we as a nation have a responsibility to meet as well,” Mrs. Obama said. “We can’t just leave it up to the parents.  I think that parents have a right to expect that their efforts at home won’t be undone each day in the school cafeteria or in the vending machine in the hallway.  I think that our parents have a right to expect that their kids will be served fresh, healthy food that meets high nutritional standards.”

Continue reading the wisdom of the First Lady Food Nazi>>>

Read Full Post »

Looks like the majority know better than politicians and also understand the word ILLEGAL means criminal.

From Rasmussen Reports:

Voters are evenly divided over whether young people brought to this country illegally by their parents should be viewed as breaking the law. Making a distinction between illegal immigrants and their children is at the heart of the so-called DREAM Act that some in Congress are hoping to pass before the end of the lame duck session.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 43% of Likely U.S. Voters say young people brought here illegally by their parents should be considered lawbreakers. Forty-four percent (44%) disagree and say they not be viewed as breaking the law. Thirteen percent (13%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

When it comes to adults, however, voters’ views are much clearer. Seventy-six percent (76%) say adults who enter the United States illegally should be considered lawbreakers. Just 12% disagree, and another 12% are not sure.

Fifty-eight percent (58%) of Americans oppose automatic citizenship for a child born in this country to an illegal immigrant.

Of course Democrats ignore the majority and will attempt to pass the Dream Act. They have to find more weak-minded individuals to replace the Liberals and Independents that are fleeing the party.

Read Full Post »

And to think, our tax dollars are paying for this.

(CNSNews.com) – Planned Parenthood Federation of America has decorated its Web site with its traditional “Choice on Earth” parody of the “Peace on Earth” message, just in time for the Christmas season. But in addition to gift certificates for Planned Parenthood services, a new line of designer condoms is also on sale, with proceeds benefiting the nation’s largest abortion provider.

A new design by Keith Haring joins those by Alexander Wang, Charlotte Ronson, Jeremy Scott and others who are designing packaging for condoms under the “Proper Attire: Required for Entry” trademark, accompanied by fig leaf artwork. The fashion celebrities have contributed covers for three-packs of condoms, which are for sale on Planned Parenthood’s Web site for $5.99.

The campaign features a designer handbag to imply the fashionable condoms will be a perfect fit. Media reviews scroll above the handbag on the Web site such as “Condom Couture, Straight Out of Velvet Rope Culture,” “Protect Yourself in Style,” “These are Condoms for the Fashion Forward,” and The ‘It’ Condom — Fashionable Love Gloves.”

The latest addition of the “condom collection” features the image of Haring’s “Untitled,” from 1985.

The description of the packaging says, “A small splash of color that can brighten the drabbest of outfits. Limited edition packaging incorporating Keith Haring’s classic image of dancing figures and barking dogs.

“Premium lubricated latex color condoms, designed for more fun and to maximize pleasure,” the packaging says.

Haring “Untitled, 1988” is also in the collection.

“Ethereal, weightless, almost like wearing nothing at all,” the description says.

On the “About Us” portion of the campaign, Planned Parenthood describes the condom sales this way:

“Old stereotypes about who should buy condoms are so last season! PROPER ATTIRE® condoms are the “must-have” accessory and were designed with stylish women in mind. The fashionably chic PROPER ATTIRE design helps ensure that now you can feel completely comfortable buying condoms and carrying them with you.

“Not only are you protecting your health by buying PROPER ATTIRE condoms, you are also supporting a great cause. Proceeds from the sale of PROPER ATTIRE condoms will benefit Planned Parenthood Federation of America.”

These benefits will go to fund more abortions for the ‘undesirables.’ Margaret Sanger is smiling up from Hell.

Read Full Post »

H/T to DiversityLane

Read Full Post »

Great news taxpayers of America. A federal just has ruled that provisions of Obama’s health care takeover are unconstitutional.

The Washington Post reports:

RICHMOND – A federal judge in Virginia ruled Monday that a key provision of the nation’s sweeping health-care overhaul is unconstitutional, the most significant legal setback so far for President Obama’s signature domestic initiative.

U.S. District Court Judge Henry E. Hudson found that Congress could not order individuals to buy health insurance.

In a 42-page opinion, Hudson said the provision of the law that requires most individuals to get insurance or pay a fine by 2014 is an unprecedented expansion of federal power that cannot be supported by Congress’s power to regulate interstate trade.

“Neither the Supreme Court nor any federal circuit court of appeals has extended Commerce Clause powers to compel an individual to involuntarily enter the stream of commerce by purchasing a commodity in the private market,” he wrote. “In doing so, enactment of the [individual mandate] exceeds the Commerce Clause powers vested in Congress under Article I [of the Constitution.]

Hudson is the first judge to rule that the individual mandate is unconstitutional. He said, however, that portions of the law that do not rest on the requirement that individuals obtain insurance are legal and can proceed. Hudson indicated there was no need for him to enjoin the law and halt its implementation, since the mandate does not go into effect until 2014.

The ruling comes in a case filed by Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli II (R), who said he was defending a new state statute that made it illegal to require people to carry health insurance in Virginia.

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 486 other followers

%d bloggers like this: