Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for January 6th, 2011

Fight for it now, Mr. President. In 2012 it will be repealed.

The Hill reports:

President Obama officially drew a line in the sand Thursday evening, threatening to veto House Republicans’ attempt to repeal Obama’s landmark healthcare law.

In a statement of administration policy released by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the administration said that repeal would “would explode the deficit, raise costs for the American people and businesses, deny an estimated 32 million people health insurance, and take us back to the days when insurers could deny, limit or drop coverage for any American.”

It’s already raising the costs for Americans and businesses…and it doesn’t go into full effect until 2014. How does this administration explain the ObamaCare waivers those 222 corporations and unions received? Employers are dropping health care coverage because they can’t afford the rising health care costs brought by the ObamaCare law.

Using the preliminary budget numbers Democrats seized upon on Thursday morning, OMB said that a preliminary analysis said that repeal would raise the “deficit by $230 billion in the first decade and roughly one-half of one percent of GDP, or over a trillion dollars, in the second decade.”

“Repealing the Affordable Care Act would not only increase deficits in the coming decade, but would also significantly worsen the long-term fiscal burdens on American businesses and families,” OMB said.

Yes, because we all know that adding 32 million into any system will save us money. The Democrat’s reasoning is exposed.

Repealing a bill before it becomes law will add to the deficit but adding 32 million new individuals into a system that creates more bureaucracies than can be counted upon adding more IRS agents to enforce the law supposedly lowers the deficit. Common sence overrules hopeful thinking that is backed by fraudulent numbers. Garbage in, garbage out.

How does taking a $1 trillion plus bill out of a budget increase the defict?

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

This is what Obama called the “most productive Congress in generations.” It is true. They produced the most debt than any other Congress in history, thanks to the Pelosi-Reid regime.

(CNSNews.com) – In the 1,461 days that Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) served as speaker of the House, the national debt increased by a total of $5.343 trillion ($5,343,452,800,321.37) or $3.66 billion per day ($3.657,394,113.84), according to official debt numbers published by the U.S. Treasury.

Pelosi was the 52nd speaker of the House. During her tenure, she amassed more debt than the first 49 speakers combined.

The total national debt did not climb above $5.343 trillion (the amount amassed during Pelosi’s four years as speaker) until Feb. 26, 1997, when Rep. Newt Gingrich (R.-Ga.) was serving as the nation’s 50th House speaker.

When Pelosi was sworn in on Jan. 4, 2007, the national debt stood at $8,670,596,242,973.04. At the close of business on Jan. 4, 2011, her last full day in the speakership, it stood at 14,014,049,043,294.41–an increase of $5,343,452,800,321.37.

Pelosi served as speaker for four full years, including one leap year, making her time in that office 1,461 days. On average, the federal government added $3.66 billion ($3,657,394,113.84) in new debt for each of those days.

This is what President Obama calls ‘progress.’

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

Giving power back to Congress, as the Constitution intended.

The Hill reports:

A group of House Republicans introduced a bill on Wednesday to rein in the various “czars” in the Obama administration.

Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) and 28 other House Republicans introduced legislation to do away with the informal, paid advisers President Obama has employed over the past two years.

The legislation, which was introduced in the last Congress but was not allowed to advance under Democratic control, would do away with the 39 czars Obama has employed during his administration.

The bill defines a czar as “a head of any task force, council, policy office within the Executive Office of the President, or similar office established by or at the direction of the President” who is appointed to a position that would otherwise require Senate confirmation.

Republicans had complained about the president’s use of czars to help advance his agenda in Congress. In particular, the GOP had harped about the personal history of Van Jones, the president’s czar for “green jobs,” over past comments Jones had made about Fox News came to light. Jones eventually resigned.

Another prominent czar over the past year was Carol Browner, the president’s energy and environmental adviser. She helped head up efforts in response to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, and the ultimately unsuccessful effort for an energy and climate bill from Congress.

Both Van Jones and Carol Browner are self-admitted socialists/communists. Neither went through Senate confirmation because Obama knew their histories/political beliefs would be questioned for all to see.

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

Hypocrite! Double-talker! Silver-tongued politician!

All those describe President Obama. Obama went and picked another fellow Chicagoan (think thug) to replace an already gone Chicago thug (Emanuel). Who in their right mind would appoint a Chicago Daley into a power position with the known corruption that comes along with that surname?

Mmm, Mmm, Mmm…Barack Hussein Obama, that’s who. Corruption begets corruption and Obama seems to love having these individuals as friends, advisors, pastors and White House Chief’s of Staff.

Come on people. Don’t act like you’re surprised to learn that Obama loves him some radicals. I know over 53% of you were tricked by that catchy campaign slogan of ‘hope and change’ and ‘yes we can,’ but when you see a man with so many corrupt pals, well…you know the saying “you are who you surround yourself with.”

Obama relentlessly was on television telling the lie that he wasn’t put into office to help fat-cat bankers. Then what does he do? He turns to a fat-cat banker from JP Morgan Chase, whose just happened to receive $25 billion in taxpayer bailout money then spent hundreds of millions to outsource jobs to India.

William Daley was a fat-cat banker with JPMorgan Chase.

This is the same William Daley who also served on the board of Fannie Mae, and received hundreds of thousands of dollars in compensation. The same William Daley who pushed for Fannie to make all those risky loans to unqualified individuals in Chicago. We all know how the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac fiasco was one of the major causes of the financial crisis.

Isn’t it curious that Obama’s ex-Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, was a board member of Freddie Mac? Jane Hamsher, a liberal blogger, has a great article about Emanuel and his time at Freddie Mac and why the Obama regime never appointed an Inspector General to oversee Freddie and Fannie.

So Obama has surrounded himself with those evil fat-cat bankers he claims to dislike. He surrounds himself with individuals who worked with the same institutions who created the financial mess in the first place. Then he wants us to believe that he is the man making the best decisions to right the wrongs.

Obama has turned Washington, DC into Chicago on the Potomac.

Read Full Post »

The D in Democrat must stand for dumb-as-shit. Why would any Democrat want Pelosi back as House Speaker after suffering historic losses in the November midterms? This is the same Botox-faced idiot who led a Congress with a 13% approval rating that is the worst in history; added $5 trillion to the national debt and doubled unemployment.

This is what Democrats call progress and want back in power.

The Hill reports:

House Democrats’ goal is to make Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) the Speaker of the House again, their campaign chairman said Wednesday evening.

Rep. Steve Israel (N.Y.), the chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), set his goal as nothing short of winning back control of the House in the 2012 elections.

“We’re all trying to win it back,” Israel said on MSNBC when asked if it was Democrats’ goal of winning back enough seats to make Pelosi, the former Speaker and new minority leader, the next Speaker.

Democrats lost 63 seats in the 2010 congressional elections, which delivered Republicans control of the House. Democrats would need to win 25 seats now held by Republicans to flip control of the House back in their favor.

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

Snidely Whiplash

A drop by Hot Air can be an eye opening experience.

Take for example Steny Hoyer’s utterance “There are a whole lot of people in the Tea Party that I see in these polls who don’t want any compromise. My presumption is they have unhappy families.” This was Hoyer’s way of object lesson and social commentary. I think he was saying if you’re from a broken home environment ya don’t know how to compromise. Wonder if Steny was as confused when he said it as I am trying to make heads or tails of it?

As well, a simple listening to the news of the day reveals a New York Times columnist thinking so long as kids will read it, censoring classics, Huck Finn specifically, is a good thing. Wouldn’t want the “N-word,” or the word “Injun”, right? Odd, I’m part “Injun,” and it doesn’t bother me a bit. Am I supposed to be outraged? Offended? Can I sue someone over this? I’ll be offended as Hell if there’s money in it for me.

Yeah, and the Bible is too long and should have the Reader’s Digest version supplant the King James version. And while we’re at it, let’s just toss out most of the laborious articles and sections of the old, old Constitution thingy…that would please Joy Behar who warns some have gone just a little too crazy with all this “Constitution stuff.” It’s getting “out of hand” according to Joy, who Rush hilariously nicknamed “Maude Behar!”

In yet another example of idiotic, bizarre and sheer hypocrisy, there’s Harry Reid wanting to alter the Senate’s filibuster rules. Seems he doesn’t like how the Senate currently allows members to take breaks, get substitutes, etc., and laments that there are so many filibusters nowadays. Could it be because, so many filibusters I mean, the Senate as led by progressive Reid is, instead of an august contemplative chamber, a loony bin of progressives wild with power, frothing at the mouth to shut down opposition dissent?

Continue reading Snidely’s article>>>

Read Full Post »

H/T to Bob Parks @ Black and Right

Read Full Post »

I hope Joe didn’t teach the kids how to count…

Politico reports:

Vice President Joe Biden looked thrilled to be back in the U.S. Senate Wednesday, where he was swearing in senators and yukking it up with many of his old colleagues. 

And after he administered the oath to Georgia’s Johnny Isakson, the senator’s grandson, Jack, had a question for Biden: Could construction workers build a LEGO shop in Washington?

“I’ll tell you what, I’ll work with grandpop to see if we can get that done,” said Biden. “We need jobs, Jack. The kid’s thinking! He wants to build a LEGO shop here.”

Joe immediately told Obama and Obama called the union thugs to tell them of the new project. Jack’s plans will be halted when Obama’s EPA informs him that his plant will emit too much of that evil CO2. Jack should know that Democrats aren’t very good job creators.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 486 other followers

%d bloggers like this: