Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘DCCC’

The botox queen is a shakedown artist who demands loyal followers to blindly give up money or you’re not part of the team. Maybe Nancy should donate the profits she’s made from her insider trading scheme.

From Politico:

A tale of two politicians: President Barack Obama auctions off dinners with himself or Sarah Jessica Parker to raise cash; House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi opts for a considerably more direct approach.

Pelosi met with about ten senior House Democrats at the headquarters of the Democratic Congressional Campaign committee Tuesday night and issued a blunt assessment: The rank-and-file wasn’t raising enough cash to fuel her underdog plans for a takeback of the House, and a handful of Dems hadn’t lived up to their targeted pledges and needed, if necessary, to be shamed into action.

Then the former speaker handed the leaders — including Steny Hoyer (D-Md.),  Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Jim Clyburn (D-SC) and Xavier Becerra (D-Calif.) — three specially printed cards to be distributed to members, with a deadline of this Friday, end of business, according to a person present.

Card One: “Yes, I will contribute [blank] by June 30th.”

Card Two: “No I will not give in June” but I pledge to give [blank] by [blank].

Card Three: “No, I am not on the team.’

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

I ain't giving up my "fair share"

Obama exposes himself as a typical liberal progressive. He loves to preach about others not paying their “fair share” and wants them to give up more of their money. Just don’t ask Obama to do the same.

From Politico:

President Barack Obama has a bleak message for House and Senate Democrats this year when it comes to campaign cash: You’re on your own.

Democratic congressional leaders, including Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, have privately sought as much as $30 million combined from Obama for America and the Democratic National Committee — a replay of the financial help they received from Obama in 2008 and 2010.

But that’s not going to happen, top Obama aides Jim Messina and David Plouffe told Reid and Pelosi in back-to-back meetings on Capitol Hill on Thursday, according to sources familiar with the high-level talks. It was a stark admission from a presidential campaign once expected to rake in as much as $1 billion of just how closely it is watching its own bottom line.

Messina and Plouffe told the two Hill leaders that there would be no cash transfers to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee from OFA or the DNC, at least not before Election Day, the sources said.

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

Raaaacists!

Politico reports:

House Democrats’ campaign chief shocked Congressional Black Caucus members when he told them they aren’t essential to the party’s strategy to win back control of the chamber in 2012.

“Can we win the House without the CBC? Yes,” Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Steve Israel (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday at a meeting aimed at ironing out differences between the committee and the CBC. “Do we want to win the House without the CBC? No.”

Without the taken for granted black vote, Democrats would sink.

Fellow New Yorker Yvette Clarke, who is a member of the CBC, immediately objected, calling Israel’s remarks “not right,” according to witnesses.

If it came from a white Republican, she would’ve screamed “racists.”

Israel quickly backtracked — clarifying that he didn’t mean it the way he said it — but he had already played into the perception that the DCCC takes the CBC for granted.

Over 50 years of voting only for Democrat, despite the outcome, tends to do that.

The two groups are perpetually at odds over a simple political reality: CBC members, most of whom occupy safe Democratic seats, don’t see much return on the dues they pay the party. From the DCCC’s perspective, the CBC comes up short on its obligations. But from the CBC’s perspective, the DCCC refuses to ensure the political safety of black lawmakers in primary and general elections — or to recognize that members from poorer districts have trouble raising large amounts of campaign cash.

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

Just to show the liberal double standard, let’s look at real evidence.

This targeting map is from DLC.org:

This targeting map below was scrubbed from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee site. Gee, I wonder why?

All of these ‘targeting maps’ are from Democrats but they only want you to blame Palin’s targeting map, with surveyor symbols, not crosshairs for the assassination attempt on Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords…

Those of us with firearm knowledge knows what a crosshairs looks like:

See the difference?

Read Full Post »

The D in Democrat must stand for dumb-as-shit. Why would any Democrat want Pelosi back as House Speaker after suffering historic losses in the November midterms? This is the same Botox-faced idiot who led a Congress with a 13% approval rating that is the worst in history; added $5 trillion to the national debt and doubled unemployment.

This is what Democrats call progress and want back in power.

The Hill reports:

House Democrats’ goal is to make Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) the Speaker of the House again, their campaign chairman said Wednesday evening.

Rep. Steve Israel (N.Y.), the chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), set his goal as nothing short of winning back control of the House in the 2012 elections.

“We’re all trying to win it back,” Israel said on MSNBC when asked if it was Democrats’ goal of winning back enough seats to make Pelosi, the former Speaker and new minority leader, the next Speaker.

Democrats lost 63 seats in the 2010 congressional elections, which delivered Republicans control of the House. Democrats would need to win 25 seats now held by Republicans to flip control of the House back in their favor.

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

If they did, this should piss off every taxpayer and small business who have been denied a loan while being forced by the government to bail out these too big to fail banks. It looks like another Democrat ‘sweetheart deal’ from those evil ‘fat-cats’ they pretend to not like.

From PajamasMedia.com:

Shortly after Labor Day, as polls continued to sink, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) realized it needed a cash infusion for the upcoming midterm elections. Its chairman, former Virginia Governor Tom Kaine, turned to the Bank of America to secure a $15 million revolving credit line. Then, in the middle of this month, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) got another loan from BofA for an additional $17 million.

What was their collateral? It turns out, not much.

The DNC claims their collateral was an intangible piece of property — its donor mailing list. The DCCC only cites unnamed assets.” Neither party organization possesses real estate even close to cover the $32 million. The DNC’s headquarters is owned by another entity. Even it was put up as collateral, its market value was last estimated at only $13.7 million.

Were the Bank of America deals legitimate, arms-length transactions, or were they cozy sweetheart deals in which nothing was really put up to secure a $32 million loan?

And if it was the latter, could it be considered an illegal campaign contribution from the largest bank holding company in America?

There also is troubling evidence that two days before closing on the loan transaction, the DNC changed its own privacy provisions to allow the selling or sharing of private donor data.

BofA has been a longtime friend of Democrats. In the 2008 election cycle, BofA gave its largest single campaign contribution to then-Senator Barack Obama. According to Bloomberg News, BofA’s new CEO, Brian Moynihan, is considered Obama’s top political ally on Wall Street.

On the eve of the midterm elections, the appearance of preferential loans from cozy Wall Street bankers could play badly with the electorate. What message does a largely unsecured $32 million credit line for the Democratic Party send to thousands of cash-starved small businesses across the nation who can’t secure any credit even with tangible assets?

The findings are part of an exclusive Pajamas Media investigation.

The DNC loan agreement as posted online by the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and signed by former Virginia Governor Tim Kaine (D) on September 16, 2010, says the loan collateral included: “All electronic mail (‘E-mail’) addresses and other contact lists, records and other Information (electronic or otherwise) relating to contributors, supporters and subscribers owned by any of the Borrowers.” The borrowers in this case were the DNC and the DNC Services Corporation.

The loan agreement further stipulates that if the Democrats defaulted, Bank of America would be entitled to “proceeds from any fundraising activity, refunds, reimbursements, or proceeds from the rental or sale of mailing, contact or subscription lists or Information (electronic or otherwise).”

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

The liberal media is actually telling Americans the truth…sometimes. The New York Times has run a few articles that called attention to Obama unsubstantiated claims that the Republicans and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce are using foreign donations to “steal democracy” and elections.

Now we have more lies being expose at the Democrats expense.

The Hill.com reports:

Democratic lawmakers struggling to find support from a skeptical electorate are using a Republican tactic to win votes by claiming their opponents will raise taxes if elected into office.

Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) is just one of several Democratic candidates saying the FairTax – a levy that replaces the federal income tax with a 23 percent sales tax on everything, including the purchase of a new home or car – is backed by Republicans and will bust family budgets if enacted into law.

Research supplied by FairTax.org shows that Democrats in 16 districts have run at least 31 ads blasting Republicans for supporting the tax. But many of these ads neglect to mention the levy is essentially a national sales tax that would replace the current federal tax system.

FactCheck.org recently slammed the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) for running ads that omitted this fact.

“Democrats are accusing Republicans of supporting a 23 percent sales tax on everything, which would be on top of all existing taxes… it’s misrepresenting by omission of the FairTax idea,” FactCheck.org director Brooks Jackson told The Hill.

“When people try to sell it on false evidence we step in,” he added.

The DCCC recently pulled a FairTax ad in Michigan’s 1st District because it didn’t provide the full story on the tax. DCCC spokesman Ryan Rudominer said they would not include details of the tax in future ads.

“What Republican candidates don’t want you to know is that if they had their way, they’d slap middle class families with a twenty-three percent national sales tax-hike on almost everything you buy – cars, clothes, groceries, even medicine,” he said, adding the tax is “simply wrong for middle class families and Republicans shouldn’t be surprised when it’s rejected in November.”

The ad ran on behalf of Democrat Gary McDowell, who faces tea partier Dan Benishek in November’s election.

“It’s very deceptive,” Philip Hinson, national spokesman for FairTax.org, said of the ad.

“It just speaks to the desperation of the Democratic Party because they see an absolute tsunami developing and they can’t come up with anything better than this,” he added.

This is ironic since it is the Democrats who want a Value Added Tax to be implemented. It is a secret tax on everything and this will steal from all socioeconomic classes and allow the government to continue it’s out of control spending sprees.

Read Full Post »

I pray dear what's your name that Americans continue to buy my lies and fraud

Hey. He’s a practicing Christian. Trust him. He just refuses to say creator where it is mentioned in historical documents. It happens to all of us.

CNS News reports:

Just seven days after he sparked controversy by omitting the word “Creator” when he closely paraphrased the passage from the Declaration of Independence that says all men “are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights,” President Barack Obama again omitted the Creator when speaking about the “inalienable rights” that “everybody is endowed with.”

This time the president was speaking at a Sept. 22 fundraiser for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) at the Roosevelt Hotel in New York City, and his reference to “inalienable rights” was not as close a paraphrasing of the Declaration as it had been the week before.

“And what was sustaining us was that sense that, that North Star, that sense that, you know what, if we stay true to our values, if we believe that all people are created equal and everybody is endowed with certain inalienable rights and we’re going to make those words live, and we’re going to give everybody opportunity, everybody a ladder into the middle class, every child able to go as far as their dreams will take them–if we stay true to that, then we’re going to be able to maintain the energy and the focus, the fight, the gumption to get stuff done,” Obama said at the DCCC/DSCC event, according to the transcript posted by the White House.

Speaking at the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute’s Annual Awards Gala on Sept. 15, Obama had left out the word “Creator” when otherwise virtually quoting from the Declaration of Independence.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident,” Obama said at that event, “that all men are created equal, endowed with certain inalienable rights: life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That’s what makes us unique.”

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

Politically Incorrect News for the Politically Incorrect Reader

Some items you may or may not have read…

Item #1- TSA Subpoenas Bloggers, Demands Names of Sources. The Transportation Security Administration is going after bloggers who wrote about a directive to increase security after the incident. Just a suggestion…go after the towel headed Muslim extremist who want to blow up planes and leave bloggers alone. Where’s the ACLU now?

Item #2- U.S. takes majority stake in GMAC, giving lender $3.8 billion more in aid. Another taxpayer-funded bailout to support those who helped Obama get into the White House. Spreading the wealth as only Obama can.

Item #3- Don’t Taser me bro. Federal court restricts Taser use by police. Ninth Circuit ruling — allowing an officer to be held liable for injuries a man suffered after being Tasered — sets a precedent that may force agencies to revisit their policies.

Item #4- DCCC: Obama ‘more aggressive in fighting al Qaeda’ than Bush. I guess giving al-Qaeda terrorist three months rest in Afghanistan and constitutional rights by bringing Gitmo detainees to U.S. soil is what Liberals consider ‘more aggressive.’ Is it ‘more agressive’  refusing to use the word terrorism and going over to the Middle East to appease Muslims with apologizing for America?

Item #5- Bankers Get $4 Trillion Gift From Barney Frank. It authorizes Federal Reserve banks to provide as much as $4 trillion in emergency funding the next time Wall Street crashes. So much for “no-more-bailouts” talk. That is more than twice what the Fed pumped into markets this time around. The size of the fund makes the bribes in the Senate’s health-care bill look minuscule. Socialism is alive and doing well in the U.S.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 486 other followers

%d bloggers like this: