Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘liar-in-chief’

You know you’re a certified liar when you document lies in your very own autobiography. Joe Wilson continue to be proven correct.

From Politico:

One of the more mysterious characters from President Obama’s 1995 autobiography Dreams From My Father is the so-called ‘New York girlfriend.’ Obama never referred to her by name, or even by psuedonym, but he describes her appearance, her voice, and her mannerisms in specific detail.

But Obama has now told biographer David Maraniss that the ‘New York girlfriend’ was actually a composite character, based off of multiple girlfriends he had both in New York City and in Chicago.

“During an interview in the Oval Office, Obama acknowledged that, while Genevieve was his New York girlfriend, the description in his memoir was a “compression” of girlfriends, including one who followed Genevieve [Cook] when he lived in Chicago,” Maraniss writes in his new biography, an excerpt of which was published online today by Vanity Fair.

Though Dreams From My Father is an autobiography, and hence non-fiction, Obama makes no mention of this “compression,” nor is their any note by the publisher, Broadway Books. In fact, Obama only acknowledged the “compression” after Maraniss learned that Cook had no recollection of some of the events at which Obama said she was present.

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

Hard to debate facts when using Obama’s own words against him. Obama made a lot of promises and told a lot of lies to get elected.

Read Full Post »

The man is the biggest liar in political history.

From The Washington Times:

President Obama is claiming at political rallies that he has fulfilled “60 percent” of his campaign promises from 2008, but the scorecard of an independent arbiter suggests Mr. Obama is grading himself on a curve.

The watchdog organization Politifact.com, which evaluates the veracity of politicians’ statements, said Mr. Obama made 506 promises during the campaign three years ago, and he has kept 151, or 30 percent. Add the campaign pledges on which Mr. Obama has compromised to get part of what he wanted, and his “mission accomplished” tally rises to 39 percent.

Nonetheless, the president is telling supporters that he has worked three-fifths of the way through a checklist of initiatives that he keeps in his desk and that he needs to be re-elected to finish what he started.

“We’re through about 60 percent of it, which isn’t bad for three years,”Mr. Obama told a crowd at a fundraiser in Denver on Tuesday night. “So we know change is possible. But here’s the thing: There are a lot of people who are still hurting, and there’s still a lot more work to do. And so that other 40 percent that is not done. I’m going to need you because I need five more years. I need five more years to get it done.”

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

I am the greatest...at spending YOUR money!

If his definition of success means bankrupting America, then yes, he is the most successful in our 235 year history.

From Politico:

President Barack Obama offered a sober assessment of his 2012 campaign to supporters Monday night, admitting that the “newness” was gone but urging his grassroots troops to organize with the same fervor that propelled him to victory in 2008.

On a conference call with hundreds of organizers, volunteers and campaign operatives, Obama played up the threats posed by Republicans to his agenda while boasting of “hav[ing] had the most successful legislative initiative of any president over the last 50 years.”

The call was the culmination of a day-long roll-out of his re-election campaign, which began with the 5 a.m. release of a video entitled “It Begins With Us.” That was followed by an email to supporters, the filing of re-election paperwork with the Federal Election Commission and a more exclusive rally-the-troops conference call with top donors conducted by campaign manager Jim Messina.

“I’m fired up, I don’t know about everybody else,” Obama said after being patched through by the White House switchboard to a core group of campaign workers that pulled off an upset victory over Hillary Rodham Clinton in the Democratic primaries nearly three years ago and went on to defeat Republican John McCain.

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

I had to ask “has hell frozen over” because the Washington Post actually fact-checked both the liar-in-chief and Pantsuit.

Glenn Kessler reports, viaWaPo:

“We have already engineered the most rapid and forceful set of sanctions [against Libya] that have ever been applied internationally.”
–President Obama, March 3, 2011

If Republican cuts are approved, “we will be cutting back on our support for global health; in particular, support through the PEPFAR project, which was started by President Bush, which has been continued and very strongly supported by President Obama. Hundreds of thousands of people will be cut off of their life-sustaining drugs. Others will never have access to them.”
–Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, March 2, 2011

Guess Hillary hopes nobody read the NYTimes Op-ed from Desmond Tutu entitled “Obama’s Overdue Aids Bill” where Bush was praised and Obama was called out. Then again, those on the left care nothing for the truth.

There is an understandable need among politicians to exaggerate, not only about their achievements but also the problems that the nation faces. Exaggeration makes the issue seem a little more urgent, or the accomplishment just that much better.

 Last week, in separate appearances, both President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton pushed the envelope on foreign-policy issues in subtle yet distinct ways. To the casual ear, their comments may have seemed correct or perfectly reasonable. Let’s look closely at what they said — and why they said it.

To paraphrase: Both Obama and Hillary lied.

Continue reading>>>

Read Full Post »

The man simply cannot help himself. If his lips are moving, you will hear lies. Now the liar-in-chief is claiming Republicans wanted to end tax cuts for the middle class.

Republicans wanted EVERYONE, from every socioeconomic class, to keep their Bush tax cuts, which prevents the Democrats from spending more of their hard-earned money. The Republicans believe in equal rights for everyone while Democrats believe in special rights for select groups. Listen to them talk and you will see this time and time again.

Obama goes on to claim that we can’t afford these tax cuts to the wealthy but fails to mention that tax cuts don’t add to the deficit. A deficit happens when the government spends more than it takes in.

I love the hypocrisy being exposed. Democrats have claimed since 2001 that Bush’s tax cuts only went to the rich and now they want to keep those Bush tax cuts for the poor and middle class.

Read Full Post »

Who said the U.S. Constitution was a charter of negative liberties? Who openly attacked the Supreme Court of the United States during his State of the Union speech? Who has falsely misinterpreted the ruling to make their case seem just? Yes, the liar-in-chief, Barack Hussein Obama.

There goes the lies again. Obama is still upset about the Supreme Court of the United States ruling against the FEC in the Citizens United vs. FEC case. This is why Obama openly attack SCOTUS during his first State of the Union speech. Of course, Obama lied about the ruling and this forced Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito to mouth “not true.” Obama tried to make it about foreign corporation spending unlimited amounts during elections. There is already a law that prohibits this and one would think a “constitutional scholar” such as Obama would know how to read legal rulings.

Obama is upset because corporation can now produce movies and pamphlets, which the FEC sought to stop. Citizens United produce a movie about Hillary Clinton and it was stopped from being released during the presidential campaign. Free speech is free speech.

Of course Obama and the Democrats wanted to pass a bill to fight the Supreme Court ruling. Except, they carved out special exemptions for Unions, the AARP and the NRA. Why would the Republicans vote to restrict the rights to free speech, as Obama and the Democrats have attempted to do since the dictator took office? The attacks on Fox News and other media; the attacks on U.S. citizens and now these attacks on corporations. It’s all in the name of transparency.

Read Full Post »

So who do you believe when it comes down to two liars-in-chief? The Obama White House (via ex-Clintonian Rahm Emanuel) claims they used ex-President Bill Clinton as a go-between when they offered Joe Sestak (D-Pa) a job if he decided not to run against Obama-supported Arlen Spector.

This story has gone on for months and now Clinton is denying involvement in the job offer all together. It’s hard trying to find the truth when the lies happen so commonly. There truly is 3 sides to every story.

In February, allegations that someone inside the Obama White House offered Pennsylvania Senate Democratic nominee and three-star Navy Admiral Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) a job in exchange for his withdrawal from the PA Senate Primary race were made by Sestak himself.  In late-May, White House Counsel Robert Bauer released a memo claiming that “The White House Chief of Staff enlisted the support of former President Clinton who agreed to raise with Congressman Sestak options of service on a Presidential or other Senior Executive Branch Advisory Board. Congressman Sestak declined the suggested alternatives, remaining committed to his Senate candidacy.”

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Ranking Member Darrell Issa (R-CA) responded, “You know the saying there’s three sides to every story, well, now we have it.  Admiral Sestak has repeatedly said he was offered a ‘job’ in an effort to obtain his withdrawal from the Senate Primary.  The White House has said ‘efforts were made in June AND July” in said job as well as the admission that they ‘enlisted’ former President Clinton to make the overture.  President Clinton says he ‘never tried to get Sestak out of the race.’  Who’s telling the truth?”

WBRE-TV has reported that former President Bill Clinton, who until yesterday has not spoken publicly on the controversy, denied any involvement in trying to maneuver Sestak out of the race:

Clinton denied it to EyeWitness news, saying he never tried to get Sestak out of the race and has never been accused of it.” (WBRE-TV, 8/10/10)

 Sestak told a different story on May 28th:

Last summer, I received a phone call from President Clinton. During the course of the conversation, he expressed concern over my prospects if I were to enter the Democratic primary for U.S. Senate and the value of having me stay in the House of Representatives because of my military background. He said that White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel had spoken with him about my being on a Presidential Board while remaining in the House of Representatives.

Read Full Post »

For Politically Incorrect Readers

 

Some items you may or may not have read…  

Item#1- Obama attempts to hijack the success of Iraq and claim it as an accomplishment of his own doing. Forget that he was against it and the Bush troop surge. Now the liar-in-chief is telling Disabled Veterans that he is keeping his promise of troop withdrawal by the end of 2010. He also forgot to mention that this was an agreement made by the Bush administration with the Iraqi government.  

Item #2- Since we are talking about Obama’s lies. How about this one? Obama tells Disabled Vets Disabled “American Veterans, I valued your advice and counsel when I was a senator, when I co-sponsored the Post-9/11 GI Bill.” The liar-in-chief strikes again. Obama didn’t c0-sponsor the bill because it was started in the House…Obummer was in the Senate. DOH! Oh, and he was 1 of 7 who didn’t vote on it.  

Item #3- Backdoor Amnesty. Democrats want it while the majority of Americans are against it. Will this stop them?  

Item #4- Question for Obama and the Dems: What if Revenue From the Rich Dries Up? Whose wealth would you spread if this scenario happens?  

Item #5- “They’re all lily-livered wimps, and Obama has the backbone of a worm.” Robert Reich, a Obama fluffer said this. Things are looking bad for Obummer.

Read Full Post »

Obama liar

The Liar-in-Chief

After watching Obama use double-talk, time and time again, it should not shock to anyone that he was just caught doing it during a Jake Tapper interview. This president stood in front of America and lied. During his health care speech, Obama looked into the camera and lied when he said no federal dollars would be used to fund abortions in his health care bill. As Joe Wilson (R-SC) pointed out, Obama is a liar.

See if you can spot the Obama double-talk in this Jake Tapper interview.

JAKE TAPPER, HOST: So, thanks so much for doing this.

BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: Thank you.

TAPPER: Here’s a question a lot of Senate Democrats want to know. You said, when you gave your joint address to Congress, that under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions. This amendment passed Saturday night which not only prohibits abortion coverage in the public option, but also prohibits women who receive subsidies from taking out plans that — that provide abortion coverage. Does that meet the promise that you set out or does it over reach, does it go too far?

OBAMA: You know, I laid out a very simple principle, which is this is a health care bill, not an abortion bill. And we’re not looking to change what is the principle that has been in place for a very long time, which is federal dollars are not used to subsidize abortions.

And I want to make sure that the provision that emerges meets that test — that we are not in some way sneaking in funding for abortions, but, on the other hand, that we’re not restricting women’s insurance choices, because one of the pledges I made in that same speech was to say that if you’re happy and satisfied with the insurance that you have, that it’s not going to change.

[BUT???] This liar stood there, lecturing us about calling out people who spread misinformation about “his” health care plan, and stated abortions would not be covered. Now Obama is using the gift of double-talk to lie to our faces again. Abortion will be covered and Obama knows that has been his plan the entire time. That’s our liar-in-chief!

So, you know, this is going to be a complex set of negotiations. I’m confident that we can actually arrive at this place where neither side feels that it’s being betrayed. But it’s going to take some time.

TAPPER: Do you think that amendment is status quo or does it lean a little bit in one direction or the other?

OBAMA: I think that there are strong feelings on both sides. And what that tells me is that there needs to be some more work before we get to the point where we’re not changing the status quo. And that’s the goal. The goal here is to make sure that people who have health insurance have greater stability and security, people who don’t have health insurance get the ability to buy it affordably and that we’re driving down costs.

And, you know, I think everybody understands that there’s going to be work to be done on the Senate side. It’s not going to match up perfectly with the House side. But obviously, it was a historic night for the House. We’ve never been this far. And I’m very confident that my colleagues in the Senate are going to say to themselves that we’ve got to get this done.

That’s Obama. Says one thing to make himself look like a centrist, then turns around and shows his radical far-left ideologies. Again, more proof that you cannot believe a single statement this liar makes. These words came out of Obama’s mouth and his followers cannot claim they didn’t.

Has anyone notice that Obama never gives a straight answer on anything? Usually, Obama resorts back to the familiar “we inherited a mess” and it was “Bush’s fault” for x, y and z. Anyone want to make a wager that the abortion debate will be one of the reasons Obama’s health care bill will not pass the Senate?

We already know this bill will not be deficit neutral. We already know Obama wants to cover abortions and health care for illegals [think "immigration reform"]. We also know that Obama and the Donkeys will attempt to rush this vote before Christmas break. If they let this bill sit out for extended periods of time, people will have time to read it and that is a no-no for these jackasses.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 486 other followers

%d bloggers like this: